• KSR Obviousness And BMC Joint Infringement Revisited

• GBT, Foley Hoag and Adduci Prevail in ITC Investigation

• District Court Holds Software Transfer Not A License

• Quanta v. LG Electronics, Inc.

• Foreign-Based Trademark Registrations in Canada Clarified

• Chinese Court Settles Conflict Between Existing IP Rights

• Prosecution Disclaimer in "Familial Patent"

• Inequitable Conduct Based on Petition to Make Special

• Rambus: Alleged Deceptive Conduct Not Actionable

• Summary Judgment Granted to Bausch & Lomb in TM Dispute

• Cat Tech: "Second Prong" DJ Requirement Met

• Patent Litigation Under a Future Biosimilars Act

• No Claim Preclusion If Devices Not "Essentially the Same"

• Polo - Ralph Lauren - Copyright Claim Comes Unstitched

• Litecubes Sales F.O.B. Canada

• Jury Awards Grantley $66 Million

• “Marks” Rule Applied where Opinion Lacks Majority Support

• Cadbury's Purple Patch Comes To An End For Now

• Lundbeck v. Generics: Chemical Claims

• Patent Case for Repligen Settled

• New EU Design Law In Practice: A New Area Of Disharmony?

• Death to the Continuation Rules

• Indian Restaurant Trademark Protected in the US

• Experts Central to Two Huge Sanction Awards

• Yamaha Successfully Defends Infringement Claim

• No Idea For Ikea

• New Formulations Found Obvious By A Federal District Court

• Judge's Mistake Cause for Reversal?

• Experts’ Testimony Decisive Factor in $74M Patent Case

• GPC Subsidiary Awarded Permanent Injunction, Treble Damages

• Festo Litigation at Age 20

• Seagate Willfulness: Supreme Court Conference this Wee

• Copyright Quake Hits California

• Nuijten Signal Claim

• $8.6M Sanction for Discovery Abuse

• TiVo $ 74,000,000.00 Verdict Against EchoStar Affirmed

• Supreme Court Hears Argument In Quanta v. LG

• Can Contractual Wording Trump Patent Exhaustion?

• An Early Route To Market For Generics?

• $160 Million Jury Verdict Against Microsoft Stands

• The Bajaj-TVS Patent Dispute Makes IP a Business Tool

• Aristocrat Technologies: Missed Filing Dates

• Supreme Court Rejects Petition in Miller v. Brand

• PTO's Bogese-based "Prosecution Laches" Support

• In re Lew "New Matter" and "Possession" Requirements

• Advanced Card Technologies Settles Patent Lawsuit

• Tafas v. Dudas "Continuation Rules" Litigation

• Imitation of Marks in Bulgaria

• Delay in Presenting New Claims Not Basis for Rejection

• Company Names...Trade Marks: Vive La Differénce!

• Google News Infringes On Newspaper Publishers' Copyright

• Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard For Joint Infringement

• Do You Need To Pay For Saying "DAX"?

• The Indefatigable Spirit of the Novartis Patent Case

• Paice v. Toyota

• Patent Malpractice "aris[e] under" §1338

• Pro Se Inventor Nailed for Inequitable Conduct Mistakes

• Dr Reddy's v. Lilly

• Acts Before Patent Grant Excluded From Infringement

• Mixed Verdict, Three Opinions, Injunctive Relief Sustained

• SFLC Files First Ever U.S. GPL Violation Lawsuit

• Jury awards TruePosition $45.3M in patent infringement trial

• AFG - 11 Year Old Patent Case Reaches Supreme Court

• Commercial Identity: A Sine Qua Non

• Version Recording: Limit under the Copyright Act

• Triple Dose of Bad News to Non-Practicing Patent Holders

• Credit Card Firms May Process Fees for Pirated Images

• Seagate: "Objective Recklessness" Standard

• Court Decision Places Broad Class Of Patents In Jeopardy

• Lucent v. Microsoft

• Festo Case Propelled To Its "Foreseeable" Conclusion

• Indian High Court Defers TRIPS Violation Question to the WTO

• Resolving Indefiniteness and Construing Patent Claims

• New Risks for Patent Holders, Boon for License Buyers

• Distinctiveness Acquired in a Descriptive Mark

• Patent Rendered Invalid through Grammatical Error

• Parallel Importing Given A Workout

• Key Summary Judgment Rulings For SMART Technologies

• AstraZeneca in Second Wave Prilosec® Trial

• Frankie Goes to Hollywood with Trademark Victory

• Federal Jury: Qualcomm Infringes Three Broadcom Patents

• Merck v. Integra - Celebrating Two June Anniversaries

• Advanced Analogic Technologies Receives Full Defense Verdict

• Patent Infringement Victory for Invitrogen

• Pfizer v. Apotex

• Federal Circuit Reverses Interference Decision

• From McCHICKEN to McJOY, it's McDONALD'S All The Way

• Indian Court Attaches Priority to Prior User

• KSR's Worker of "Ordinary Creativy"

• Addressing All Listed Patents May Not Be Needed

• On the Supreme Court decision in KSR v. Teleflex

• Comments on KSR Supreme Court Ruling

• Punitive Damages- Effective Tool To Contain Infringement

• Innogenetics v. Abbott:

• International Patent Expertise: A Tale of Two Countries

• Bleak House Patent Litigation

• Uninterrupted Use- An Essential Aspect In TM Protection

• Diomed Holdings Wins $12.5 Million Award in Patent Case

• Celebrex Patent is Held Valid, Enforceable against Teva