• Remarks Made by Chief Judge Paul Michel

• Needed: A proper definition of 'Inventive step'

• Getting the Patent Reform Wars on Track

• Fighting Against Discovery Abuse and Winning

• The Right Focus for Patent Reform

• Evaluating IP Programs

• UPDATE: Is the Jaffe/Lerner Analysis of Patent Law Correct?

• Is the Jaffe/Lerner Analysis of Patent Law Correct?

• Is the Lanham Act "Positive" Law? Does it Matter?

• Bad Patents, or Bad Copyists?

• Leaving A Law Firm In The Internet Age Raises TM Issues

• Federal Circuit Affirms: Local Patent Rules Have Strong Bite

• Update on Trade Secret Law

• Statutory And Nominative Fair Use Under The Lanham Act (III)

• Statutory And Nominative Fair Use Under The Lanham Act (II)

• Statutory And Nominative Fair Use Under The Lanham Act (I)

• Dilution Revision Act:

• Lawyers Should Be Cautious When Copying Other Lawyers' Work

• Old Remedies in the Biotechnology Age: Moore v. Regents II

• Old Remedies in the Biotechnology Age: Moore v. Regents I

• The Evolution of "Written Description Requirement"

• Cybor De Novo Claim Construction Review:

• MIT v. Abacus

• Patent Lawsuits: New Federal Rules on Electronic Files

• Now You Have It, Now You Don't:

• Trademark Protection and Risk of Common Usage

• Reexamining Patent Reexamination Practice:

• Curbing the Menace of Deceptive Similarity in Packaging

• 35 USC §101 "Electrical Signal" Patent-Eligibility Test Case

• Infringement Issues – the Ambit Widens

• eBay Revisited

• The Risks of Buying Secrets

• Patent Teamwork

• How Uniform Laws & Restatements Guide Federal Common Law

• Cheetah and Hare: Compare With Care

• Free Flow of Information vis-à-vis Copyright Infringement

• Government Liability for IP Infringement

• Continuation Rules Moving Ahead:

• Laches and Acquiescence

• Judicial Review of PTO Trademark Decisions:

• BlackBerryGate

• The Flexibility of Mediation

• The PTO's Document Disclosure Program: Boon or Boondoggle?

• Reducing Intellectual Property Validity Conflicts

• On 'Patent Trolls' and Injunctive Relief

• Copyright Infringement of Insurance Policies

• Alternative Dispute Resolution:

• USPTO to Bar: We Are Drowning in Continuations

• Is Google Redefining Digital Copyright Law?

• Claim Interpretation - Reading Limitations into the Claims

• Two Most Common Mistakes Lawyers Make in Using IP Experts

• Limited License Term Can Defeat Licensee's Standing to Sue

• Options for Enforcement of IP Rights in China

• Microsoft v. AT&T

• Who Owns Your "Future" Business?

• Shotgun Counterclaims:

• Globalization Hits Patent Law

• Color-Blind Claim Construction

• eBay: When Should Permanent Injunctions be Denied?

• Successful Mediation of Intellectual Property Disputes

• "Exhaustion" of the Priority Right at the EPO

• Antitrust Issues and the Hatch-Waxman Act

• Moving Forward with Section 337

• Seismic Supreme Court Halloween Patent Activity:

• Bird Flu: Emergency Access to Patented Drugs?

• Two Law Reviews from Silicon Valley:

• Understanding U.S. Electronic Discovery

• How to Deal with TLD Indicators in Trademark Applications

• Erroneous Submission to USPTO is not "Good Enough"...

• The Potential Pitfalls of Overlapping Design Patents and TMs

• Patents Invalidated By Expansive Literal Claim Scope

• The Potential Pitfalls of Registering Product Shapes as TMs

• TRADE DRESS - Do You Have One?

• UK Patent Office Software and Business Method Applications

• Appeals Court Clarifies Law Governing Patent Claims

• When Easy Cases Make Bad Law

• Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine

• A Patent Office Printing Error can Invalidate a Patent

• Stakeholders Discuss an Overhaul of the Patent System

• Generic Drugs and Their Approval - Part II of II

• Generic Drugs and Their Approval - Part I of II

• "Old" Applications - Examination After Final Rejection

• "Whereby" Clause can Limit Scope of Method Claim

• Sweeping Changes to U.S. Patent Laws may be on the Horizon

• Protecting Trade Secrets Through Non-Competition Agreements

• The Interplay Between Patents & Trade Secrets in Litigation

• Patent Bar Requirements

• Ownership Matters—But Only at the Start and Finish

• Avoiding Prosecution Estoppel and Saving Money

• Practical Tips on Intellectual Property Law

• Court Shifts Cost of E-Discovery to Requesting Party

• Specific Description of Trade Dress Required for Injunction

• Recent TM Enforcement Cases & the Importance of Registration

• Why Parties Can Cite "Unpublished" PTO Opinions

• ART Act–Going After the "Cameraman" in the Movie Theater

• Feist Reconsidered

• Schmeiser v. Monsanto and Its Effects on Patent Prosecution

• Proof of Joint Inventorship Must Be Clear and Convincing

• Narrow Claim Construction Avoids Invalidity