ipFrontline intellectual property news magazine
SME Inventing
  patent attorney law magazine
patent attorney law magazine
Search   Site Map
Sign up for IPFrontLine now.
intellectual property invention and technology magazine
 
 
Article ToolsEmail It   |  Print It   |  Blog It!  |
     
Consequences of Patent Application Errors

IPFrontline.com  

AKRON, OHIO (March 2, 2006) - The Patent, Copyright & Trademark Law Group of Akron, recently named one of the top patent firms in the country by Intellectual Property Today magazine, warns that errors in patent applications can lead to extra fees, delays, denial of patents, or invalidation of awarded patents.

"Since 1990, the number of patents processed by the US Patent & Trademark Office has more than doubled," said John Gugliotta, Patent Attorney with the Patent, Copyright, & Trademark Law Group. "The patent error resolution process is time consuming and expensive, so having your patent application reviewed for accuracy, even after issued and published, is an excellent investment of time and money. While a patent professional's meticulous review is important, it can all go for naught if not properly implemented by the clerical staff at the patent office. It turns out that the simple process of the inventor proofreading the text of his patent after it is finally received can make a huge difference in the end."

According to intellectual property group Intellevate, 98 percent of patents issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office have errors. While the majority of errors are simple spelling or grammar errors, some patents are granted with errors that compromise the core claims of the patent. In more than a third of applications, the error is significant enough for patent holder to file a Certificate of Correction with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. "A Certificate of Correction is easy to obtain, assuming these clerical errors are identified as soon as possible," Gugliotta added.

John Gugliotta successfully prepares patent applications for individuals internationally, with a heavy concentration on small entities from Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania from his offices in Northeast Ohio. Over the past 13 years applying for patents, he had added expertise in chemical, mechanical, electronic and business systems areas. Gugliotta is licensed to practice law before the United States Supreme Court, State of Ohio Courts, the Federal Northern District of Ohio and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as well as being a Registered Professional Engineer.

Patent, Copyright & Trademark Law Group, LLC
800.218.4243
http://www.PCTLawGroup.com

Article ToolsEmail It   |  Print It   |  Blog It!  |

There are NO comments related to this article. Be the first!


 
 


 Read More Inventors' Bill of Rights Unveiled at AUTM Conference
 Read More Are You Listening To Your Customers?
 Read More From Idea to Nationwide Movement
 Read More AIPR Joins Small Business Coalition on Patent Legislation
 Read More The Cost of Improper Patent Marking
 Read More Deck the Halls — Offices and All!
 Read More 10 Steps to Revitalize Your Project Portfolio Management
 Read More Congress Calls for Co-ordinated Response to Counterfeits
patent trademark copyright news magazine for attorneys intellectual property managers  
patent trademark copyright news magazine for attorneys intellectual property managers
patent trademark copyright news magazine for attorneys intellectual property managers

ipFrontline, IP200 and PatentCafe are trademarks or registered trademark of Pantros IP, Inc.
©Copyright 1996-2010 Pantros IP, Inc. All Rights Reserved